Here is my latest imagination of a solid state version of Tesla's Special TriMetal Generator.

I incorrectly quoted someone in this video. It's the north pole, not the south pole, which this fellow says has a slight tendency of sticking to an aluminum chunk of metal.

My only addition to this line of imagination is to add a capacitor to make this into a tank circuit to create a reactively responsive relationship between the circuit and the external load. This is assuming that a solid-state version of Nikola Tesla's Special Generator can only be an AC device. William Lyne's story of the mechanical reciprocating piston variety lends itself to an AC version as well. So, there may not be any DC version, possible, which takes this generator out of the realm of direct correlation to any conventional homopolar or unipolar generator of Michael Faraday's legacy.

Sweets hand-dipped in beeswax/oil blend.

Sweets hand-dipped in beeswax/oil blend.

The Definition of a Transformer

trans·form·er

/ˌtran(t)sˈfôrmər/

noun

1. 1.

   an apparatus for reducing or increasing the voltage of an alternating current.
2. 2.

   a person or thing that transforms something.

If this is the definition of 'transformer', then this is like saying that the definition of 'mankind' is equivalent to saying 'white folk'. A little prejudiced against DC transformers, eh?

But wait...

There's no such thing as a DC transformer, right? Wrong...

Consider the Perpetual Motion Holder made famous by Edward Leedskalnin consisting of a horseshoe piece of magnetizable iron with at least one coil of wire wrapped around one of its legs. The bottom of each leg is planned smooth and sanded to fit flush against the side of a magnetizable iron plate long enough to span the two legs and create a magnetically closed circuit. A weight is attached to this plate to make it nice and heavy. One end of the coil is connected to a light bulb. The other end of the coil is detached from anything. Another piece of wire comes off the other side of the light bulb and is also not attached to anything.

Go To Energetic Forum for an Explanation of this Schematic

By momentarily connecting the two loose ends of wire to a DC power source, namely: a battery - just for an instant /by brushing the contacts/ while the iron bar spans the two legs of the horseshoe shaped iron core, we now have stored DC energy into this transformer indicated by the bulb momentarily lighting up. We can tug the iron plate all we want to, but unless we slip it sideways, it won't want to come off too readily. And we can leave this device, as is, for any length of time with no diminishment of stored force. But once we slip the iron plate off to one side and disconnect the magnetic loop, we no longer have any magnetic energy stored inside the horseshoe core. This loss of energy was indicated by the light bulb flashing once again when the magnetic loop is broken upon removal of the iron plate from its fixed position spanning across the two legs of the horseshoe iron core.

Now, I contend that this constitutes one half cycle of an AC transformer in which energy is stored and then it is released when the next half cycle is begun in reverse polarity.

But there is another way to define this...

The storage of magnetic energy constitutes a time delay in which each half cycle of storage constitutes the delay between the moment the energy goes into storage within the confines of the iron horseshoe and plate arrangement, and the moment this same energy comes out.

So, the true definition of a transformer is a device which accentuates the factor of delay. This also holds true for electrostatic delay in which the breadth of dielectric spanning two plates of a capacitor governs the rate at which a capacitor may charge or discharge its stored energy.

This was made clear to me reading Mark McKay's analysis of the thickness of the aluminum chassis (page 13) surrounding the EV Gray motor, and Tesla's Induction device...

The inside of the chassis was insulated by a thin coating of teflon to prevent arcing. But this insulation also provided for the chassis to function as one plate of a capacitor. And this outer plate was electrically coupled to a lead acid battery pack to harvest the buildup of electrostatic energy (as a useful benefit) to recharge the batteries and hopefully performed in such a way as to avoid blowing up the batteries - which unfortunately happened more often than not!

But the point is that...

It is possible to redefine transformers to include, rather than exclude, a DC situation by restating its definition, thusly...

trans·form·er

/ˌtran(t)sˈfôrmər/

noun

1. 1.

   an apparatus for delaying the saturation or desaturation of an electric charge or current across a dielectric or magnetic membrane, respectively, with the intention of altering the relationships between their various causes and effects.
2. 2.

   a person or thing that transforms something.

This may be what Jim Murray and Paul Babcock have managed to do in some of their devices.

Could Tesla and Marvin Cole, in the EV Gray motor, have figured out a simple way to do this? Maybe...

At least the conceptual model could be simple whether or not its execution is simple as well...

So, getting back to 'design characteristics', let's redesign an imaginary mockup of a Tesla Special Generator...

• Two pancake coils, counter-wound to each other, are sandwiching a thin (iron?) magnetizable membrane.
• Surrounding this are two more membranes, but this time made of aluminum.
• All three plates/membranes and coils are thoroughly coated with a resinous sealant, such as: Delrin (aka, Delron) or Tesla's favorite recipe: pine rosin, beeswax and 5% carnauba wax.
• There is a gap between the three plates and coils sufficient to prevent arcing among them and the coils.
• The width of the exterior aluminum plates and the width of the midline magnetizable membrane are variably dependent on design characteristics of time delay required for electrostatic and magnetic effects to have any beneficial impact on the operation of the entire system.

This device is not a generator in the normal sense, but an extender, in which the load is now contributing to its own power supply /via modification of the load's feedback/ creating magnetic and electrostatic delays. But if William Lyne's quotation of Tesla, and our assessments are [here on this blogsite] correct, this would truly constitute a self-running (not self-starting) generator that could last "5,000 years" with no moving parts.

Links to ODT files at Gratisenergi.se

cannady, creation, credits, crosby, cset, delta, detection, electrostatic, Energy Impulse Secrets, EV Gray, Gray Engine, Impulse Power Secrets, James, Mallory, Mark, Phinney, Stretched, Supporting, The Main Barrier Before Hydrogen Power Industry, The Motors Generators, The New Law Of Electrical Power Formation, Timming

The similarities between Marvin Cole, John Searl and Charles Chandler.

If you've been following this discussion of Tesla's Special Generator, you may have noticed that several researchers have replicated each other's works unbeknownst to each other.

The electrostatically charged tornadoes of Charles Chandler's analysis replicates the electrostatically charged air ventilated throughout the Marvin Cole design of the EV Gray motors according to Mark McKay's analysis. And these first two examples replicate the arcing along the surface of Searl's spinning metallic disk.

All three ionize the air. All three exhibit coronal effects. All three defy gravity freaking out Marvin Cole which led to his immediate refusal to work on the EV Gray motor anymore. At least two require rapid rotation of several thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of RPMs. And rapid rotation can be assumed of tornadoes, as well, since the interior of a tornado may not spin as slowly as its perimeter? Its core may constitute a multitude of concentric, and non-concentric, eddy currents defying wholistic coordination, but - in the end - balancing out all of their disparate energies.

This makes analysis of the mechanical variety of Tesla's Special Generator relatively easy, because we have all of these inventors replicating Tesla's general idea in their own unique way.

But the more advanced solid state version still eludes me for what's missing is the kinetic energy of a moving part resulting in the - oh, so - convenient separation of charge between a dipole of positive and negative charges maintained without recourse to spin?

So...
Let me propose a possibility for the sake of our imagination...

Suppose metallic spin is replaced with arcing within a partially vacuated tube of air of normal humidity? Whether or not these light bulbs contain filaments, or not, or whether any possible filaments are made of tungsten or some other catalytic candidate to momentarily convert water vapor and dinitrogen into combustible ammonia and hydrazine before reverting back into their former states in an endless cycle, maybe this could replace a spinning metallic disk?

I'm looking for spin on a molecular, or atomic, level apart from any macroscopic spin which could be imparted upon small particles to replicate metallic spin previously reported on large scale objects.

The reason why I suggest light as a substitute for metallic spin is because someone did an analysis of sparks as to why do they create an excessive avalanch of electrons resulting in an overunity situation?

"For every 200 pounds of iron, one horsepower is added to its output" - William Lyne, Pentagon Aliens

By shifting our attention away from a mechanical Special Generator of Nikola Tesla to a solid-state version, we shift the whole emphasis from electromagnetism to electrostatics. No longer do we emphasize the need to add more iron to this device's chassis to make it more powerful. Instead, we add more dielectric. And the choice of dielectric material becomes important. Not glass, nor plastic, but a resin derived from living creatures or else delrin.

Mark McKay states: "pine rosin, beeswax and 5% carnauba wax" was Tesla's favorite sealant for coil windings and also a favorite of other people's electric motor designs in Tesla's time. EV Gray's motor used delrin (also called: delron) to soak up electrostatic charge. And the EV Gray motor had lots of electrostatic charge produced by arcing between the stator and the rotor indicated by this warning from pages spanning across 47 and 48 of this internet doc file...

In June of 1976, after the DA fraud case was settled, Gray was able to retrieve what was left of the EMA4-E2 (in boxes) after it had been run through the metal shredder. It is suspected that Hackenburger dug through these fragments and finally figured out what it was that he had over looked. What ever he found lead to yet another disaster just down the road. Some time in 1977 Richard got things to click and the machine came alive in the 50KW region. However, what ever he did was somewhat different that what was done with the EMA4. The result was a huge continuous burst of RF white noise that spanned several radio bands that lasted several minutes while Richard was congratulating himself on being able to figure out what it took to get this machine to come alive. He probably didn’t have a clue that he was generating such a powerful EMI signature, since it was never a problem with the EMA4, then again he didn’t know about the anti-gravity phenomenon that caused Marvin Cole to bolt. 

In LA during 1976 this kind of event didn’t pass unnoticed by the authorities who are charged with policing the airways. It took them about 2 minutes to get an accurate fix on the source of the disturbance. The very next day two truck loads of armed FBI agents showed up and didn’t even knock. They didn’t even present a warrant. Apparently the War Powers Act of 1941 gives the FCC unmitigated storm trooper authority to do what ever it takes to put an end to any source of unlicensed RF energy. They took everything; the EMA6, the tools, the drawings, the file cabinets, Hack’s soldering gun, and the borrowed coffee pot. Nor were they polite about it. 

It is unknown just how this issue was resolved. Both men could have been hauled off to prison for life if the FCC wanted to. There probably was a substantial fine involved as well (that didn’t get paid). It probably became clear to the FCC & FBI that these two men were just crackpot inventors and not commie terrorists. The parting message (as recounted by Nelson Schlaft) was straight to the point. “Don’t ever work on this again. WE WILL BE WATCHING”. Some say this event proves that the MIB were involved in suppressing this technology. Actually this is just the run-of-the-mill treatment any tax paying citizen would receive when bucking the establishment in matters of unregulated RF transmission in excess of a few milliwatts. Researchers should keep this in mind. If you are working with this technology and are producing arcs for more than a few seconds, then have a couple of transistor radios close at hand tuned to three separate and widely placed channels (AM, FM, and UHF). Pay attention to how much noise is being picked up and take preventative measures as needed, or else all of your efforts will be hauled off to the local incinerator. You may or may not have to pay a fine and show up in court but you will definitely be told “Don’t ever work on this again. WE WILL BE WATCHING”.

 So, we take the previous design...

...and reduce the multiple copper disks to just two: one placed on each side of the aluminum disk.

The aluminum disk remains stationary and the copper disks are converted into pancake coils whose diameters are slightly larger than the diameter of the aluminum disk sandwiched between them. The aluminum disk is encased in either a waxy sealant derived from living creatures (the Tesla recipe cited above) or else delrin or something else similar. This sealant becomes the new focal point for the storage of energy. No longer is iron the main attraction anymore, for electrostatics completely dominates this new design - not electromagnetics. Thus, the quote from William Lyne in his book, "Pentagon Aliens", that "for every 200 pounds of iron, one horsepower is added to its output" is no longer the measure by which to judge the augmentation of output. Instead, the mass of dielectric sealant becomes an additional energy sink to serve as the new focal point for this device and further reduce the strategy of how much sealant does it take to improve performance by drastically reducing this standard from "pounds of additional iron" to an unknown fraction of this for sealant - a small enough fraction to make possible the dimensional shrinkage of this device to a mere notebook sized generator as witnessed by my friend who watched as his coworker demonstrated his ability to power a small electric motor with his solid state version of Tesla's Special Generator composed of iron, copper and aluminum as its significant ingredients. To this list we must add an appropriate dielectric when converting Tesla's device from its former glory as a mechanical contrivance to a more efficient solid state model exhibited to my friend by his coworker over a decade ago.

The hookups become interesting. The two pancake coils should be connected in parallel with their connection to load, but one of these pancake coils - either one, it doesn't matter - remains disconnected. And the rapid spin of the aluminum disk, inherited from the Searl design, is replaced by the use of the dielectric sealant covering this disk and physically separating it from the copper wound pancake coils sandwiching it. The iron chassis remains as a magnetic membrane (derived from patent # 433,702 of 5 Aug 1890) between this generator and its environment which of course includes its load. Thus, the load (for example, a motor) becomes the secondary and this device becomes the primary of Tesla's patented Electrical Transformer, or Induction Device, from Aug 1890. Whether or not it becomes necessary to magnetically couple the chassis of this device to the chassis of the load or to ground, I don't know.

This is not a self-starting device. External power has to be provided electrically in parallel to this device and load energizing both, or else the shaft of the inductive load has to be turned to a sufficient RPM, before the external power source can be disconnected. In the mechanical version, external power was continually provided by compressed air so this concern did not materialize.

Why avoid foods rich in phytates and oxalates if the lactic acid of sauerkraut does such a good job at neutralizing these calcium absorption inhibitors?

Alternate Title: Preventing Tooth Decay with Sauerkraut! 

The hardest problems to overcome are those born of our ignorance - our errors of omission, rather than our errors of commission.

I find the lactic acid of sauerkraut to be so powerful at overriding calcium absorption inhibitors that I see no reason why I should avoid foods rich in phytates or oxalates, such as: oats, brown rice, beets, spinach, etc, if I include sauerkraut in my diet everyday? Nor do I avoid beans for this same reason.

Of course, I don't limit myself to just sauerkraut to satisfy my craving for sour foods. I try and include a mix of other foodstuffs rich in the other natural acids, such as: sour apples (malic), sour grapes or cherries (tartaric), and lemons (citric).

Being a vegan (most of the time), I find it essential to not restrict myself any further than I already have. And I certainly don't stay away from a good methylated B-complex. And I include seaweed for trace minerals everyday.

Nor do I avoid salt. I just don't eat the stuff. Awk!

I bathe in salt, instead, along with MSM and silver hydroperoxide (AgOOH) made by taking colloidal silver and reacting it with food grade hydrogen peroxide until I get a non-fizzy clear liquid. I wouldn't want to drink AgOOH, either, since it is an oxidizer not unlike bleach. But soaking in a bath with it using well water from our tap sure beats municipal chlorination, or -worse- chloramination. Yuck!

Failure to methylate appears to be a major contributing factor for several malabsorption related diseases according to Autism Coach.

That's why I use a methylated B-complex and methylated MSM variety of sulphur instead of the cheaper quality of cyanocobalamin B12, or the unmethylated sulphur in Epsom salts.

But I wouldn't give up my veganism just because it appears to be unnatural to take a B-complex supplement to survive the prospect of nerve degeneration due to lack of B12. I know that it is unnatural to not have a victory garden nourished by my nightsoil and get some of the B12 manufactured by my colon by failing to wash off any dirt adhering to root vegetables, etc. I can make my own B12 in my large intestine, but can't absorb any of it unless by some means or another it should reach my small intestine in a somewhat hygienic format (such as the result of biological processing from soil bacteria). So, without a garden plus composting, I make do with a vitamin pill. Oh, well... The hazards of modern life.... Could be worse.

On a side note...
At least silver is a nutrient for bone formation seeing as how it is one of six options for bone matrix to choose from whenever collagen wants to bind to calcium hydroxyapatite to form bone - the other five elements it has to choose from being: copper, iron, beryllium, zinc or lead due to their atomic diameters - page 133 of Dr. Robert Otto Becker, MD's, text: "The Body Electric"...

Lead and beryllium aren't elements I'd usually think of as nutrients, let along essential nutrients, but there it is... All six are candidates for bone formation whether or not any one of them are toxic by themselves.

Of course, argyria does not indicate toxicity of silver and more than the presence of oxalate or phytate indicates toxicity of spinach or oats. It's a lack of absorption of silver or oxalates, not their mere presence, which indicates a problem.

Oxidation of silver is the solution to argyria brought about by a transference of electrostatic charge rendering oxidized silver more electronegative than the electropositivity of metallic silver alone. Hydrogen peroxide is the means whereby a negative net charge can be transferred to nano-sized particles of silver easily rendering metallic silver safely bioavailable for cellular absorption unlike silver salts which have no net charge, of either polarity, to contribute to silver's excessive ionization.

Excessive is not a bad word in the context of bathing in excessively ionized silver. Although AgOOH is an oxidizer, it has its place in the bath among its supportive ingredients of MSM and salt. And argyria is worth avoiding if for no other reason than to prove the silver naysayers wrong.